{"id":12011,"date":"2025-09-05T09:47:58","date_gmt":"2025-09-05T07:47:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/?p=12011"},"modified":"2025-08-14T11:49:03","modified_gmt":"2025-08-14T09:49:03","slug":"reading-sample-dissel-levick","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

If justice ignores the destruction of our environment, can it ever truly be called justice? What good is fairness if it leaves behind mountains of waste for future generations? Christian Bauer looks into these questions in his article \u201cEcofeminism. How Our System Is Devouring Nature, Labor, and Care\u201d, published in the volume \u201cMaterializing Fairness. Addressing Gender in Design and Tech<\/a>\u201d (edited by Julia-Constance Dissel and Melanie Levick-Parkin).<\/p>\n

Reading sample, pp. 15\u201317.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Ecofeminism. How Our System Is Devouring Nature, Labor, and Care, \u2013 and What Design Can Do about it<\/h3>\n

by Christian Bauer<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

1 John Rawls\u2019 idea of fairness and the ecofeminist concept of justice<\/h4>\n

Imagine we lived in a world in which everyone had equal starting conditions. This could be described as having equal opportunity. Now, imagine we lived in a world in which all people had secure access to clean drinking water, to shelter that offered protection from climate events, and to a healthy diet. This could be called resource justice. For some, this world is within reach, for others, light-years away. This is what we call social injustice.<\/p>\n

The American political philosopher and theorist John Rawls\u2019 (1921\u20132002) theory of \u2018justice as fairness\u2019, could be considered a pivotal anchor point for this anthology. This particular contribution aligns itself with the central theme of \u2018Materialising Fairness \u2013 Addressing Gender in Design & Tech\u2019 by adopting an anti-patriarchal position which is critical of technology and capitalism, inspired and informed by ecofeminist critique and philosophy. Before taking a closer look at the various manifestations of ecofeminism and clarifying its relevance, we will briefly recall the impact of the powerful horizon of justice which Rawls established through his work.<\/p>\n

\u2018Justice as Fairness \u2013 a Restatement\u2019 (2001) presents an evolution of Rawls\u2019 political concepts which he first established in works such as \u2018A Theory of Justice\u2019 (1971), \u2018Political Liberalism\u2019 (1999), and \u2018The Law of Peoples\u2019 (1999). F\u00f6rster highlights that \u2018\u2018Justice as Fairness\u2019 focuses on Rawls\u2019 conception of basic justice in a well-ordered basic structure of a liberal democracy\u2019 (ibid. 2023: 63). \u201cWith his contractarian theory of justice he is methodologically in pursuit of an individualistic project, with the intent to facilitate a reason-oriented pluralism. He envisions a free society where free and equal individuals have agency, and (should) ideally make use of their freedom in a way that is oriented towards the common good. In contrast to this, experience tells us that most people only have access to a very limited version of this freedom.<\/p>\n

Is the world and society therefore unjust? From a strictly egalitarian perspective, this is probably the case. But Rawls himself does not advocate strict or idealistic egalitarianism. He\u2019s too liberal for that. He clearly recognises that many social inequalities exist. But in his opinion, not all inequalities are to be regarded as unjust. Certain inequalities are to be tolerated on the condition that \u2018they work to everyone\u2019s advantage\u2019 (Rawls 2020: 13). Rawls calls this the \u2018Difference Principle\u2019.<\/p>\n

With his concepts in \u2018Justice as Fairness\u2019, Rawls stands on the always shaky ground of liberalism. Although a political theory with a venerable tradition, its ground is always shaky because its basic political, philosophical and economic unit is that of the bourgeois individual. And, this individual is fickle. It therefore makes sense for Rawls to abandon an overly individualistic position right at the beginning of his reflections. He claims that he understands justice \u2018exclusively as a virtue of social institutions or in the context of what I will call practices\u2019 (Rawls 2020: 9). By referring to the virtues, he builds a hinge into his theory that can function both as a supra-personal horizon of social determinations and as an emotional motivator for individual actions of all kinds. By referring to the practices of justice, by bringing up the \u2018system of rules\u2019 that is omnipresent in our everyday lives, be it in \u2018court hearings and parliaments\u2019, be it when we think of \u2018markets and property systems\u2019 (ibid.: 9, footnote 2), he sets an interesting accent that leads us to the practices of design.<\/p>\n

We may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline. Many advocates like to give design the appearance of an undisciplined discipline (Kaiser \/ Stephany 2021). However, this view obscures the extent to which modern design owes itself to scientific and technological progress and the functionalist categories of an utilitarian modernity. However, the nature of progress and the general orientation towards utility mean that their discrete charm cannot unfold equally everywhere. The development of scientific, technological and media possibilities takes place in different parts of the world in different societies in a non-simultaneity of simultaneity. This is not always fair. Development and the associated economic growth also raise questions of environmental ethics, which Rawls did not address in detail throughout his life. In order to find out what fairness theoretically consists of and what it achieves (in terms of impartiality), Rawls developed the \u201cveil of ignorance\u201d method. This is a famous thought experiment that Rawls devised to illustrate his concept of justice: The central idea is that the position an individual takes to a question of fairness when they are ignorant of\/have no stake in the social setting and structure of an issue, should be considered as impartial. He conceived this position as a moral standpoint at a time when the environmental movement in the USA was already sending out clear warning signals and the Club of Rome report \u201cLimits to Growth\u201d (1972) was on everyone\u2019s lips. The fact that the state was urged by environmental activists to take precautions against environmental disasters of biblical proportions could only be missed by an academic of his stature under the veil of deliberate ignorance. However, environmental ethical questions such as \u2018intertemporal justice\u2019 actually only play a minimal role for Rawls insofar as they cannot be represented and dealt with through his \u2018principle of freedom and difference\u2019 (Ekardt \/ Winter 2023: 623, author\u2019s translation).<\/p>\n

But the negative consequences on the lives, health and livelihoods of countless people whose lives are being destroyed by the fossil oil industries\u2019 pyrotechnics is a persistent problem. The pyrotechnic furor of the fossil fuel industry presents a persistent disruptive factor in relation to issues of justice globally, as it destroys the health, livelihoods and lives of countless people worldwide. It negatively impacts on people\u2019s dignity around the world not only through the burning of coal, gas and oil, but also through the loss of biodiversity, the rampant degradation of soil, and the general contamination of water and air. All these horrendous losses, which are basically almost impossible to quantify, are hardly affected by Rawls\u2019 difference principle. Only his \u2018saving principle\u2019 might make people prefer sustainable and intergenerationally just economic activity. \u2018The saving principle is supposed to dictate that each generation should leave behind for the next exactly what it would have good reason to claim for itself (Rawls 1975: 319\u2013327).\u2019 (ibid.: 623) Drawing on this, the international community has come at least this far by presenting the definition of sustainable development in the 1986 UN report \u201cOur Common Future\u201d (better known as the \u201cBrundlandt Report\u201d), which has been valid ever since and by which means current national practices are still coordinated under the auspices of the sustainable development goals.<\/p>\n

In contrast to this, ecofeminist activists of recent decades, who today also act primarily as promoters of an ecofeminism that is \u2018intersectional, interdisciplinary and international\u2019 (Hansen \/ Gerner 2024: 17), do not shy back from emphasizing these concrete injustices and inequalities that prevail worldwide. In many cases, the injustices and violations of human dignity are directly or indirectly targeted against women and their children. These injustices are not atemporal \u2013 they enmesh the living and past generations, who, in the last centuries of technical-scientific development and economic growth, have left behind one thing above all: garbage and waste. Against the backdrop of litter pollution and the unresolved problems of \u2018final storage\u2019 which reveal a general lack of a \u2018will to sustainability\u2019 (Bauer 2024: 23\u201326), the question arises as to whether the members of contemporary societies should be regarded from the outset as the relatively privileged ones who have been particularly blessed by modern developments. The discourse on ecofeminist positions outlined below illustrates that the most advanced positions in applied sciences are not necessarily those that lead to a good, just and livable society. Incidentally, it was not Rawls\u2019 intention to theoretically enable such a society with his theory of justice. Rather, he made a restrictive statement: \u2018Justice should not be confused with a comprehensive view of a good society; it is only one part of any such conception. It is important, for example, to distinguish the sense of equality that is one aspect of the concept of justice from the sense of equality that is part of a broader ideal of society.\u2019 (Rawls 2020: 11)<\/p>\n

In doing so, he cleverly salvages himself from claims that we will deal with below \u2013 the claims that arise from an ecofeminist reading of equality. The extent to which ecofeminists also intend a comprehensive social ideal will be discussed again in section three, when we take a closer look at the utopian potential of this intellectual and activist movement.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Would you like to continue reading?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Order \u201cMaterializing Fairness. Addressing Gender in Design and Tech\u201d in our shop or download as e-book<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

Materializing Fairness<\/a>\"\u201cMaterializing<\/a>
\nAddressing Gender in Design and Tech<\/p>\n

edited by Julia-Constance Dissel and Melanie Levick-Parkin<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Interested in more reading samples? Have a look at our blog<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If justice ignores the destruction of our environment, can it ever truly be called justice? What good is fairness if it leaves behind mountains of waste for future generations? Christian …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":12015,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2172],"tags":[2977,3025,3026,3007,3008,3027,3009,2892,2893,3010,3011,3012],"class_list":["post-12011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-snippet","tag-academia","tag-christian-bauer","tag-design","tag-design-education","tag-eco-feminism","tag-ecofeminism","tag-gender-fairness","tag-julia-constance-dissel","tag-melanie-levick-parkin","tag-practice","tag-praxis","tag-tech-industry"],"yoast_head":"\n\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d - Verlag Barbara Budrich<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Reading sample from \u201cMaterializing Fairness. Addressing Gender in Design and Tech\u201d edited by Julia-Constance Dissel and Melanie Levick-Parkin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d - Verlag Barbara Budrich\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Reading sample from \u201cMaterializing Fairness. Addressing Gender in Design and Tech\u201d edited by Julia-Constance Dissel and Melanie Levick-Parkin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Verlag Barbara Budrich\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-05T07:47:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Cathrin Mund\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Cathrin Mund\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Cathrin Mund\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b6387f0508a955aa8a1af60ed3fdb1bd\"},\"headline\":\"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-05T07:47:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1578,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png\",\"keywords\":[\"academia\",\"Christian Bauer\",\"design\",\"design education\",\"eco-feminism\",\"Ecofeminism\",\"gender fairness\",\"Julia-Constance Dissel\",\"Melanie Levick-Parkin\",\"practice\",\"Praxis\",\"tech industry\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Snippet\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d - Verlag Barbara Budrich\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-05T07:47:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b6387f0508a955aa8a1af60ed3fdb1bd\"},\"description\":\"Reading sample from \u201cMaterializing Fairness. Addressing Gender in Design and Tech\u201d edited by Julia-Constance Dissel and Melanie Levick-Parkin\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png\",\"width\":900,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/news\\\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Verlag Barbara Budrich\",\"description\":\"Your partner in publishing\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/budrich.de\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b6387f0508a955aa8a1af60ed3fdb1bd\",\"name\":\"Cathrin Mund\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d - Verlag Barbara Budrich","description":"Reading sample from \u201cMaterializing Fairness. Addressing Gender in Design and Tech\u201d edited by Julia-Constance Dissel and Melanie Levick-Parkin","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d - Verlag Barbara Budrich","og_description":"Reading sample from \u201cMaterializing Fairness. Addressing Gender in Design and Tech\u201d edited by Julia-Constance Dissel and Melanie Levick-Parkin","og_url":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/","og_site_name":"Verlag Barbara Budrich","article_published_time":"2025-09-05T07:47:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":900,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Cathrin Mund","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Cathrin Mund","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/"},"author":{"name":"Cathrin Mund","@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b6387f0508a955aa8a1af60ed3fdb1bd"},"headline":"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d","datePublished":"2025-09-05T07:47:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/"},"wordCount":1578,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png","keywords":["academia","Christian Bauer","design","design education","eco-feminism","Ecofeminism","gender fairness","Julia-Constance Dissel","Melanie Levick-Parkin","practice","Praxis","tech industry"],"articleSection":["Snippet"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/","url":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/","name":"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d - Verlag Barbara Budrich","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png","datePublished":"2025-09-05T07:47:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b6387f0508a955aa8a1af60ed3fdb1bd"},"description":"Reading sample from \u201cMaterializing Fairness. Addressing Gender in Design and Tech\u201d edited by Julia-Constance Dissel and Melanie Levick-Parkin","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Reading-Sample-Dissel.png","width":900,"height":500,"caption":"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/news\/reading-sample-dissel-levick\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cWe may not always reflect on this, but design is a highly rule-based discipline.\u201d \u2013 Reading sample of \u201cMaterializing Fairness\u201d"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/","name":"Verlag Barbara Budrich","description":"Your partner in publishing","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b6387f0508a955aa8a1af60ed3fdb1bd","name":"Cathrin Mund"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12011"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12011\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12016,"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12011\/revisions\/12016"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/budrich.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}